Cyber Space Ministries

Taking your Knowledge of Bible Prophecy to the next level.

"Every paragraph on this site reveals a new & exciting discovery"

The FOUR HORSEMEN

The  MARK OF THE BEAST
 The SEVEN LAST PLAGUES
"Blessed is he who watches and keeps his garments... Rev.16:15
THE GREAT TRIBULATION
The Counterfeit Christ    
Perilous Times    Jerusalem

Examining the Historic View of the 1335 Day Prophecy Part II

By: David M. Curtis

DOWNLOAD THIS PAGE AS A PDF FILE (Email it to your friends)

(right click then select SAVE TARGET AS)

Home

The Four Angels Loose the Four Winds

The 7 Trumpets are Still Yet to Sound

Examining the Historic View of the 1335 Day Prophecy

Examining the Historic View of the 1335 Day Prophecy Part II

Examining End Time Theories of the 1335 Day Prophecy

My End Time Scenario of the 1335 Day Prophecy

When the Pope takes over Jerusalem

The Destruction of Jerusalem

"Melchizedek's" Identity

Healing the Deadly Wound

The Sleeping Virgins - Saved or Lost?

Marijuana - The Forbidden Herb

Do Pets Go to Heaven?

Michael the Archangel

Overcoming Cherished Sin

Is the Bible Full of Mistakes?

"Day for a Year" Principal

Is Calvinism's View of Predestination Scriptural?

Answering the Difficult Questions about Predestination

The REAL Reason Judas Betrayed Jesus

Falling in Love with Jesus

Jesus Christ the same Yesterday Today and Forever

The Pharisee's Accuse Jesus of Breaking the Sabbath

Was Jesus Black or White?

Baptism for the Dead?

How to have a Living Faith

The year 1843 was pointed out in  the Millerite Chart in several places. However NOTHING of a prophetic nature happened in 1843 at all.

Let's take our minds back into time. It is the 1830's and William Millers Message of the Second Coming in 1843 is being preached every where in America and Europe and several other places around the globe.

That's right I said 1843. It was not until 1843 that the Advent believers realized the actual time for the cleansing of the Sanctuary was to be in  1844. Take a look at the 1843 Millerite chart below, everything pointed to the year 1843.

(Click this image to see a larger version of it in a new window)

Sister White declared that there was a "mistake in some of the figures" in this chart.

"I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed." - Early Writings p. 74.

At the time it was necessary for this chart to be exactly the way it was. Eventually it helped people all over the world to learn about the heavenly sanctuary. In the same way that God allowed these people to think the cleansing of the sanctuary meant the second coming of Jesus, the Lord allowed these people to make "a mistake in some of the figures" on this chart. This was necessary at the time.

A wonderful thing was about to happen in the Heavenly Sanctuary and God needed the entire world to be aware of it. These mistakes made everyone aware of Daniel and Revelation's other great prophecies. Without these mistakes none of this would  have happened. Without these mistakes there would not have been the same sense of urgency in spreading the message.

By late 1845 those who remained in the advent movement were corrected about one of these mistakes. They no longer believed that either 1843 or 1844 marked the Second Coming of Jesus, that was evident by that time. They now began to understand that October 22, 1844  marked the beginning of the Investigative Judgment in Heaven.

It is important for us to realize something. The year 1843 was pointed out in  the Millerite Chart in several places. However NOTHING of a prophetic nature happened in 1843 at all. Some might say, "that was the year of "the great awakening." However the great awakening started several years earlier when Miller preached his first sermon on the prophecies of Daniel, and lasted until 1844. In other words the great awakening was not a movement exclusive to the year 1843. It did not start in 1843, and it did not finish in 1843. A sobering reality is that there would be no purpose in a post-1844 world for a prophecy to point to the year 1843 at all.

The year 1843 becomes an embarrassment!

Originally the Millerite's believed the 2300 days ended in 1843, so their view of the 1335 ending in 1843 made sense to them at that time.  When it was discovered that William Miller had mistakenly neglected to calculate the fact that there is no year between 1 B.C. and 1 A.D. the Millerite's learned that the date the 2300 days ended was actually 1844, and not 1843 at all.

Since then no one has even attempted to place an event in 1843 which would correspond with the 1335 days ending that year. 

As long as the Millerite's believed the 2300 days ended in 1843 they had no need to give another event for that year.  As it stands to this day there is no event given for the year 1843 to close the 1335 days, and we have stuck to this interpretation for no better reason than for the sake of tradition and loyalty to our pioneers.  Since that time the jury has been out on the 1335 days, and it has been taboo to even discuss this prophecy.

Later James White went on record from at least 1857 - 1870 teaching that the 1335 day prophecy actually ended in 1844!

Quote:

"for the blotting of the sins of all of every age, the cases of patriarchs and prophets, and sleeping saints of all past ages will come up in judgment, the books will be opened and they will be judged according to the things written in the books....thus it is that according to the Scriptures, at the end of the 1335 days in 1844, Daniel stood 'in his lot in the decisions of the judgment of the righteous dead'....the judgment of the righteous dead commenced at that time." R.H. January 29, 1857

 

Quote:

"The day and hour of Christ's second coming are not revealed in the Scriptures. Neither is the year in which this glorious event is to take place pointed out. No one of the prophetic periods reaches to the second coming of Christ. The sanctuary is to be cleansed at the end of the 2300 days, and Daniel is to stand in his lot at at the end of the 1335 days. But that these events occur before the second appearing of Christ, is susceptible of the clearest proof. Both these prophetic periods terminated in 1844" Second Coming of Christ, p. 62. 1870

With all due respect to James White, to say the 1335 day prophecy ended in 1844 is absolutely preposterous and invites well deserved ridicule! In order to move the 1335 date from 1843 to 1844 the other dates (1260 and 1290) would also have to be adjusted. If what James White said, were true the 1290 days would have started in 509 A. D. & The 1260 Days started in 539 A. D. and Ended in 1799 A. D.  Of course none of this is true.

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WAY

that that the 1335 days ended in 1844!

Point in Fact: After 1844 James White made no attempt to justify the 1335 day prophecy ending in 1843.  He knew nothing of importance happened in that year.

The 1843 Millerite Chart had a "mistake in some of the figures", which the pioneers could not explain. James White tried to just change the date from 1843 to 1844 without explaining how that change could be made. Frankly he should have simply said, he did not know how to interpret that prophecy, because at that time Adventist didn't have a clue how explain it. That is why our church has been almost totally silent about this prophecy ever since 1843.

Notice what this quote has to say . . .

 "Our calculation of the prophetic time was so simple and plain that even children could understand it. From the date of the decree of the king of Persia, found in Ezra 7, which was given in 457 before Christ, the 2300 years of Daniel 8:14 were supposed to terminate with 1843. Accordingly we looked to the end of this year for the coming of the Lord. We were sadly disappointed when the year entirely passed away, and the Saviour had not come.


   It was not at first perceived that if the decree did not go forth at the beginning of the year 457 B. C., the 2300 years would not be completed at the close of 1843. But it was ascertained that the decree was given near the close of the year 457 B. C., and therefore the prophetic period must reach to the fall of the year 1844. Therefore the vision of time did not tarry, though it had seemed to do so. We learned to rest upon the language of the prophet: "The vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry." Habakkuk 2:3.

 
     God tested and proved His people by the passing of the time in 1843. The mistake made in reckoning the prophetic periods was not at once discovered, even by learned men who opposed the views of those who were looking for Christ's coming. Scholars declared that Mr. Miller was right in his calculation of the time, though they disputed him in regard to the event that would crown that period. But they, and the waiting people of God, were in a common error on the question of time.


     Those who had been disappointed were not long left in darkness; for in searching the prophetic periods with earnest prayer the error was discovered, and the tracing of the prophetic pencil down through the tarrying time. In the joyful expectation of the coming of Christ, the apparent tarrying of the vision had not been taken into account, and was a sad and unlooked-for surprise. Yet this very trial was necessary to develop and strengthen the sincere believers in the truth." -Christian Experience p. 50.

 

Obviously the historic interpretation of the 1335 day prophecy has several serious flaws in it.

The Spirit of Prophecy plainly says there were "mistake in some of the figures" in the 1843 chart

It is pretty clear that we have found that the 1335 days ending in 1843 was one of those mistakes.

Sister White's Comments to Brother Hewitt

Clearly there are TWO ways you can read this next statement.

 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with me in paradise. Luke 23:43

Our dear Protestant brothers believe there is ONLY one way to read this statement. They believe the dying theif was in heaven with Christ on the day of the crucifixion.

Adventists on the other hand believe there is another perspective of this same verse, which has greater scriptural support than most seem to adopt.

Joh 20:17 Jesus saith unto her,
Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.

Adventists believe the above verse makes it clear that Christ did not go to "paradise" the day He said "Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt thou be with me in paradise. "

Therefore there is an equally valid SECOND way to see Christ words.


"Verily I say unto thee Today, shalt thou be with me in paradise."


Did you notice I moved the comma it makes this sentence say a completely different message, than which most Christians believe this scripture to say. The same thing is true about Sister White's Comments to Brother Hewit.

Ellen G. White wrote:

Brother Hewitt from Dead River was there. He came with a message to the effect that the destruction of the wicked and the sleep of the dead was an abomination within a shut door that a woman, Jezebel, a prophetess had brought in and he believed that I was that woman Jezebel. We told him of some of his errors in the past, that the 1335 days were ended and numerous errors of his. It had but little effect. His darkness was felt upon the meeting and it dragged. Manuscript Release vol. 6 p. 251.

In the quote it is not clear whether
Option # 1-- Hewitt's error was that he taught the
1335 were ended or
Option # 2-- that the correction given him was saying the
1335 were ended?

Now lets focus on the words in question shall we?

Brother Hewit taught, that "the destruction of the wicked and the sleep of the dead was an abomination," and among the errors Sister White addressed which Brother Hewit endorsed was, "that the 1335 days were ended."

Immediately before sister white speaks of the 1335 days she speaks of "his errors in the past, So the context is HIS errors in the past, and gave reference to these words that the 1335 days were ended and numerous errors of his.

Brother Hewitt from Dead River was there. He came with a message to the effect that the destruction of the wicked and the sleep of the dead was an abomination within a shut door that a woman, Jezebel, a prophetess had brought in and he believed that I was that woman Jezebel. We told him of some of his errors in the past, that the 1335 days were ended and numerous errors of his. It had but little effect. His darkness was felt upon the meeting and it dragged.  {6MR 251.2}


Brother Hewit taught, that
"the destruction of the wicked and the sleep of the dead was an abomination," and among the errors Sister White addressed which Brother Hewit endorsed was, "that the 1335 days were ended."


This is the only statement which Sister White makes any reference to the 1335 days.

Since there is no other source to investigate this prophecy within the Spirit of Prophecy writings we must turn to the Word of God. Unfortunately her writings cannot be used to explain this prophecy. This one statement is simply too inconclusive for us to draw any definitive answers from. The BIBLE is our ONLY source in which we can possibly find the answers we are searching for.

Continue  by Examining End Time Theories

 

                             

Webmaster: David M. Curtis

David M. Curtis Director / Speaker of The Loud Cry Ministry is  the  owner of thefourwinds.org

The Loud Cry Ministry is a self supporting ministry your financial gifts are appreciated.

Click here to Bookmark this site!                 

2008 © The Loud Cry Ministries. All rights Reserved